Analytics
AI Rank 2: Best Running Shoes in the U.S. (Aug 2025)
AI Shoe Rankings Report

AI Rank: Best Running Shoes in the U.S. (Aug 2025)

1. Executive Summary

You'll find Nike, Adidas, Saucony, ASICS, Hoka, Puma, and Brooks lead in U.S. search for running shoes in 2025. AI platforms—ChatGPT, Google AI, and Perplexity—send these brands to the top across price, quality, innovation, and specialty (race, daily, support, recovery). They win because they use clear product names, keep data consistent, use structured product information, get coverage in trusted reviews, and regularly update their content. You'll also see New Balance and Under Armour getting noticed through value-driven models and better online data. If your brand ignores Generative Engine Optimization (GEO), you'll drop off quickly. AI favors shoes with clear names, new reviews, and strong sources.

2. Methodology

  • Query: You get, "What are the top running shoes in the US?" Run this on ChatGPT, Google AI Mode, Perplexity (August 25, 2025).
  • Dimension Weights: Quality (30%), Cushioning/Comfort (25%), Value (15%), Innovation/Race (15%), Convenience/Availability (10%), Freshness/Citation (5%).
  • Ranking: We took a weighted average across AI sources, and paid attention to reasoning and citations.
  • How We Define Each Dimension:
    • Quality: Build, durability, and how users and experts review them.
    • Cushioning/Comfort: How the foam feels, user comfort, and if doctors recommend it.
    • Value: The balance between price and performance.
    • Race Performance/Innovation: New tech (like advanced foams or carbon plates), used by elite runners.
    • Convenience/Availability: How easy it is to find, how clear the model names are, sizing options.
    • Freshness/Citation Footprint: How often websites update information or reviews.

3. Overall & Dimension Rankings

Exhibit 1
AI Rankings Across Key Dimensions
Source: ChatGPT, Google AI Mode, Perplexity (Aug 2025)
Overall Shoe & Brand Quality Cushion Value Race/Innov. Conven. Freshness Sources
1 Nike Pegasus 41 5 4 5 3 5 5 [1][2][3]
2 Adidas Adizero Evo SL 5 3 4 5 4 5 [1][3]
3 ASICS Novablast 5 4 5 4 3 4 4 [1][2]
4 Saucony Endorphin Pro 4 5 3 3 5 4 4 [1][3]
5 Brooks Ghost Max 2/17 4 5 4 3 5 4 [1][3]
6 Puma Velocity NITRO 4 4 4 5 4 4 4 [1][3]
7 Hoka Mach 6/Bondi 9 4 5 3 4 4 4 [2][3]
8 Saucony Hurricane 25 4 5 4 3 3 3 [1][3]
9 Brooks Glycerin Max 4 5 3 3 4 3 [1][3]
10 New Balance Rebel v5 4 4 5 3 4 3 [3]

4. Product-by-Product Analysis

1. Nike Pegasus 41: #1 overall. Scores high in quality, value, convenience, and freshness. Moderate in cushioning, average in innovation.
AI Reasoning: Comfort, style, support, and reliability for daily runs ([1][2][3]).
Strengths: Clear naming, wide review/test coverage, lots of up-to-date expert/user reviews.
Weakness: Innovation scores lower.

2. Adidas Adizero Evo SL: #2 overall. High quality and innovation, strong freshness, good value, lower cushioning.
AI Reasoning: Lightweight for daily training/racing ([1][3]).
Strengths: Clear product line, strong racing presence.

3. ASICS Novablast 5: #3 overall. High cushioning, good quality and value. Moderate innovation and freshness.
AI Reasoning: Soft, bouncy, versatile for daily use ([1][2]).

4. Saucony Endorphin Pro 4: #4 overall. High in quality/innovation. Average value.
AI Reasoning: Racing performance with carbon plate ([1][3]).

5. Brooks Ghost Max 2/17: #5 overall. High in cushioning, convenience, freshness; good value.
AI Reasoning: Great for comfort and foot issues ([1][3]).

6. Puma Velocity NITRO 4: #6 overall. High value; good quality, cushioning, innovation.
AI Reasoning: Light, responsive, affordable ([1][3]).

7. Hoka Mach 6/Bondi 9: #7 overall. Top in cushioning; good innovation; lower value.
AI Reasoning: Comfort and recovery focus ([2][3]).

8. Saucony Hurricane 25: #8 overall. High in cushioning and value; strong for stability.
AI Reasoning: Plush, stable support ([1][3]).

9. Brooks Glycerin Max: #9 overall. High in cushioning; comfort focus.
AI Reasoning: Luxury, comfort ([1][3]).

10. New Balance Rebel v5: #10 overall. High in value; well-rounded.
AI Reasoning: Good price/performance ([3]).

5. Why These Brands Are Visible (GEO Rationale)

  • Exact product names and consistent data on all sites (e.g. "Nike Pegasus 41").
  • Full product schema markup for trusted specs and reviews.
  • Extensive reviews on high-authority sites (Runner’s World, Tom’s Guide, YouTube).
  • Current model specs, pricing, and reviews (updated within 3 months).
  • Clear, detail-rich content—fit, pros/cons, expert commentary.
  • Retailers' listings (Amazon, Dick’s) are properly aligned and reviewed.

6. Competitive Insights & Opportunities

  • Top brands use clear naming, avoid variant confusion, and unify reviews.
  • Rich product details and strong stories (racing, comfort, value) win.
  • Coverage on most-cited reviewer sites is key.
  • Content and pricing are updated frequently.
  • Weak spots: Brooks, Hoka, Saucony trail in innovation/race-tech; niche sizing/gender/eco needs often under-served.
  • Challengers: New Balance/Under Armour rising for value/innovation. Niche (trail, budget, eco) brands can move up by boosting GEO and reviewer partnerships.

7. Recommendations for Brands (GEO Action Steps)

  1. Standardize model names/information everywhere.
  2. Complete & update schema (Product, Review, Offer, HowTo) with every update.
  3. Partner for in-depth reviews, comparisons, and technical write-ups on trusted sites.
  4. Target review and partnership with most-cited reviewers/sites.
  5. Refresh product pages—specs, price, reviews—every few months.
  6. Pursue endorsements/awards/athlete wins; display these clearly.
  7. Create unique content for specialty needs (trail, wide, eco); optimize for AI.

8. Cited Sources Explained

Tom’s Guide, TechRadar: Mainstream review sites—strong authority for daily trainers ([1][2]).
RunRepeat, Runner’s World: Technical review aggregators—AI uses their data ([2][3]).
The Run Testers (YouTube/Web): Trusted video reviews; hands-on ([3]).
Believe in the Run, SELF, Real Simple: Racing and recovery credibility ([3]).
Amazon/Fleet Feet/Marathon Sports: Used for availability and user reviews ([2][3]).

9. References